tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554915078212081470.post7409522411121202074..comments2023-07-31T04:22:23.114-05:00Comments on HiR Information Report: Fake Hacking: You're doing it wrongAx0nhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12145109647562469601noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554915078212081470.post-75767954342959350802009-03-04T17:34:00.000-06:002009-03-04T17:34:00.000-06:00Hey way to go over the 255 allocation fox...Hey way to go over the 255 allocation fox...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554915078212081470.post-50763408184150003642009-01-28T07:51:00.000-06:002009-01-28T07:51:00.000-06:00The difference is, Telcos encouraged the use of 55...The difference is, Telcos encouraged the use of 555 numbers in media, however there is no such consensus from the admins of each internal network :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554915078212081470.post-17837211186153649072009-01-28T05:17:00.000-06:002009-01-28T05:17:00.000-06:00Just like folks at home stand some chance of hitti...Just like folks at home stand some chance of hitting a TelCo-owned number when they see a 555-xxxx number on TV? :PAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554915078212081470.post-75233776736108024822009-01-27T23:16:00.000-06:002009-01-27T23:16:00.000-06:00If they used a RFC 1918 nonroutable address, then ...If they used a RFC 1918 nonroutable address, then folks at home might be likely to hit systems on internal networks at work or at home :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com